the king of kings and Lord of Lords, who alone has immortality, who dwells in light and approachable and full of glory, who no man has seen, no can see, we praise and bless the right way. No man has seen God at any time, he only begotten some who is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared him, and grant that as we have confronted with the manifestation of his glory, we may rejoice that we have a revelation in Christ, that he is the exact transcript of thy glory and thy perfection, so that when we behold him, we behold him as the glory of the only begotten from the Father, the fold of grace and truth, that we behold him who is the image of the invisible God, the first begotten of all creation, may we worship thy son, may we worship in the power and the illumination of the Holy Spirit in Jesus being. So we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, and we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, and we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, and we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, and we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, which is correct, and we are dealing with the Holy Spirit, As the only begotten son is creating activity at the beginning, tenured, uninterrupted, power-density, in maintaining and sustaining, created reality that we can understand of the incarnation, the incarnation of the incarnation, conceived of the beginning who never be as the son of God, say, who always wants and who continues to be what he eternally wants, began what he needs just now. And in that first thing on to the one thing, he needs only five years while in the majesty of the Creator and the humble status, dignified, preached world into our world, characterised into a God-casing. And into which he came, they also necessary point to the purpose in the very situation in which we find to this in a very striking manner, it is without a form and a form. It is without a form, for a woman, say, three, for two, three, for three, that is weak, true, the flesh. God, that's the son, the likeness of the flesh of her tears, for the woman I am talking about, and from away. from our fears, in the likeness of the pleasure of sin, that it means because I think the genetic armor here is the originality of self-delighting quality and therefore means sinful pleasure. In the likeness of sinful pleasure, I use found out in a sense of human nature and so it is equivalent to in the likeness of sinful human nature, in the likeness of sinful pleasure. And so Paul orders and expresses it as awkwardly as that, he expresses it very much more succinctly in the likeness of the pleasure. Now Paul could have used this himself elsewhere or which I use that in the New Testament. He could have said that he was made in the likeness of man but he was still made in the likeness of man from a tree and so upon denominates. Made in the likeness of men, he could have said made or born of a woman. And so he does elsewhere, in the likeness of four feet of a woman or a born of a woman, invested in the flesh. He does in 1 Timothy 3.16, manifested in the flesh, or he could have used the pawn in her, which I was just interested in earlier, and three born of the seed of David according to the flesh, or he could have used expressions which are found elsewhere, for example, to say that he was made flesh. He became flesh. For the more beautiful, for the poor, he was as in this, and that has no power. And he therefore must have used it very good in it. It is a formula that approaches panel. It is a formula that approaches panel. It is a formula that is, as it were on the very great panel. It's our cause, I'm not here. That is the same, the same foot, the flesh, and therefore he used it for the age, and he says likeness. He does not suggest it. The least degree, the unveality, quite unveality, is very authentic. He was just getting this over examples that he was made of, the seed of David according to the flesh. He is serious, unnameless, painful, predication. He uses the word likeness in order to all be ate, all be ate, suggestion. Simpleness is belonging to the flesh of Christ. Since he was used in Sarthas from Artyas, he was comfortable like a mile now, or it's equivalent, because Paul could not, in simple flesh. So he had to use this qualification, likeness, painful flesh, utter expression, for close, simple, he uses it in order for the purpose of emancipating as to which Jesus is the flesh of the flesh, in every flesh, with his soul identity as the son of God, he came by a mord, fear of the flesh, the intonation of the flesh, took to sinful humanity and then fell on him. From creaturehood, his limitations would have been inevitable, if he had become man under the most ideal condition of the limitate, let him into this world. He never was in an evil condition, the circumstances from the very beginning, from the moment of his beginning, so in an evil condition, the context and circumstances, flesh and flesh. Only one condition by sent misery and death, there is in his very calm, conceivable, the other of redeeming, he came for the purpose of redeeming as Paul indicates in that very time. He had become our key as the next phrase, since he came for the purpose of redeeming my curious and pureness of sin and nature, the very curious and pureness of sin, impressed upon his human nature. In theory, Calvary, we must never isolate, then castation, there was the unpack, his decision, any man, in this form, more than 69th song, the destruction month's life-wise, on 22 and 69th. Even more gruesome, disdaining, I say, at this point, 23 and 23 and 23 and 23 and 23 and 23 and 23. We are no authentic fortress, we may be sure, that it is a sin that is pleased, the sin, as if well, the sin of God. Not allowed to really involve in the incarnation of the Son of God, for thinking was anything abnormal about the way it is emerged for me,
actual emergence from the womb, event of emergence from the womb, the miracle of the incarnation resides not in that incident, in that mere event of emergence of the, that the miracle of the incarnation can go on whatsoever for thinking, that the actual emergence from the womb
to supernatural means, indication that we have in the scripture, right, to the usual time of embryonic development, immediately nine months of 40 weeks of embryonic destruction, and it was when Jesus full time was come, that she brought forth her firstborn son. Then when the incarnation goes back much further,