All Lord and Lord, it is a good thing to among three, all by matchless glory, as the most high, and the ones who weigh in heaven above and in the earth beneath, and who has granted sub-security to thy children, that they shall never pass, and thus tie them in a secret place of the most high, and under the shadow of the Almighty, so that no evil shall be hauled them, they'll give us charge to thy angels concerning them, and do thou granteth through Christ's feet, through the new way which he has established, through fellowship with him, he may enter into the assurance of that security that belongs to those whom are thy children, except of us in this world, and forgive those things, for these are
not only do you want to foresee the knowledge of truth and evil, as after the coupled truth and man, in the previous provisions of your particular administration, and their port of service in you, have shown them thy faith, and came to the last truth, and I think it's the most terrible, namely, that the knowledge of good and evil applies to these are our service, as the provision shall, that if the provision had been susceptible, I would have come to the knowledge of good and evil, if they had been unsuccessful, they would also come to the knowledge of good and evil, but theirs...
And I'm dealing with the port which is the most terrible in that mighty point. You see, we have to take account of the fact that the three of these are not the three of the knowledge of good and the three of the knowledge of evil, are the three of the knowledge of good and evil, are the whole thing, and the condition of the element, in the event of a terrible event of successful creation, man would have a taste, to a higher state of knowledge, and at least one way in which it would have been necessary, even in a state of service and confirmed perfection, that there was evil in the universe, quite a part from the fall of this thing, and in Adam, where to attain two higher state of knowledge, he would surely have been given a large knowledge, not only of God, but of created reality, in large knowledge of God, of a potential order, in large knowledge of a potential order, he would have to have knowledge of that kingdom of evil, which are already exist, all of the devil and bear on with you, you see, this higher state of knowledge, knowledge of good and evil, until we can pass over.
Now in the event of a success of a non-success of this condition, un-success, we can very rather be more published, more published, good be this one, the knowledge, good and evil. So where we have some knowledge of good and the higher, and the higher, just playing of reality,
a knowledge of God, he had some knowledge of his potential order, but once he had entered into his knowledge, ingredient, which would never, of course, the threshold of his consciousness, consciousness, which would never have passed the threshold of his consciousness, if he had any health, his integrity, which left only to just a moment. Also, what is the exposition? It is the one that is supported by the balance of consideration, namely that the knowledge of good and evil was there to be the alternative of the potential choice. We are not disupposed.
Because knowledge, and knowledge is identical in either it would be identical in either event, we have to take into account the giant person, the giant person, in respect of conscience,
and in respect of the positive state of consciousness, the diversity in respect of content and which not in state of consciousness. Because there is now, by the fall, into man's consciousness, elements that would never have entered his consciousness unless he had seen. There was now the consciousness of guilt, there was the experience of the year, there was the emotion of shame, there also entered into his heart and mind, entirely new and radically different complex of affection, the impulses, the propensity, this disposition of motives, desires and tension, the word is whole, this position of conflict was very committed,
and we can never think of the state of knowledge, never think of the state of knowledge with very few, with the word knowledge in that formula apart from the total condition of man's heart and mind. Hence, the knowledge that we felt is not at all different radically from the knowledge to which he would have seen by a successful probation, in both cases, both cases that could be called the knowledge of God's body. That is not to be an analogy of Scripture in the use of the word no or knowledge,
the analogy of Scripture. Knowledge is a key kicker, and it is formed in the same intervieweed definition, knowledge which belongs to fallen man, rational intelligence being, and knowledge which is in certain direction. One consequence is that there is no reason for this to be an analogy of Scripture
why that one is not the use of great knowledge, which man would have attained by the medium knowledge, which is actually through this according to the mythology, that there is a multi-policity in the state of this specific by which this knowledge is to be, in terms of which this knowledge is to be defined, the happiness of this definition in the sense of the specific quality, rationalizing this, in the Holy Spirit. In theory, the object is the same in both cases. The object is the same, and knowledge of good and evil, but the knowledge itself expects from the subject to the apprehension and it is in respect of that subject, the last pretension, as opposed to this definition of shame. Against the point, as opposed to the state of the country, the last pretension, you know different things, absolutely for this definition, or go to the same option, and go to that knowledge. Now I don't think you have any difference from this definition, even if you take good and evil, in the semantics of everything, saying that in this particular definition, that is a question, good and evil is to be instructed to practice with a little canal here, that good and evil is a way to do everything, but even if you do take it that, you take it as a sentiment for everything, for all things, the insurrection, the age of thought, its meaning, not very clear, for in the knowledge of man, within the compass of man's knowledge, what, after all, are the two categories under which everything can be comprehended. What are they, Buddha Leo? These are the two comprehensive categories. Now one further observation was speculated from me, further observation was speculated. And that is that observation by its very nature involves a limited period of time, a limited period of time, unlimited probation, self-confidence, and its probation without any time, and that is self-consciousness. It should now as we found a way. Is it to bring to a final issue the destiny of man's time, so that you can see that a destiny upon a known certain event can never be a certain destiny,
never be a certain destiny, until that event has a self of the realm of uncertainty to be that uncertainty, that is known to the realm of uncertainty to that of certainty. When you see you have anality, all homelessness, which you support, that concludes. We know that in the case of the Second Adam, last Adam, obedience, covering a certain period of time, it's the overwhelming, the incredible determination, the obedience of crisis is a sinister death, and the redemption brought by his obedience is finally and irreverently secured. Likewise, in the case of the elective, we are told that they kept the twisty state, and since they are elective, they are now irreverently confirmed in that state. They are the elective, so therefore they are irreverently confirmed in that twisty state. And of course, we also know that in the case of Adam, the disobedience did just with us, as far as this administration, in irrevocable confirmation, in the same condemnation and death, irrevocable confirmation in the same condemnation and death, and therefore it is, of course, reasonable and not only reasonable, but necessary to do that, but obedience, maintained and perfected over certain period of time, we have involved a irrevocable confirmation in righteousness, justification, and life. Now we shall start on the next subdivisions of this subject of the condition, meaning the creation of the contemplation, the contemplation of the contemplation. And what we are doing in this discussion is that of solicitation to sin, solicitation to sin, the placing of an inducement, in the way of another, to do that which is contrary, to the revealed will of God. For the words of creation, we see in two others, within this discussion, it is used in a sense of tolerance, that is to try, to prove, to test, and it is also used in a sense of falling into temptation,
but it is in this many sense that it is being used in this discussion, meaning the solicitation to sin, now it is this, that is denied of God, James 113 and 14, and it is helped in the evil, evil, church of evil, meaning the church of evil, that is to say, he doesn't solid it, sin, it doesn't place before men, or the inducement to sin. This is very, this is to say, it is very taken in the case of the academic administration, the inducement God placed before our first parents was in the opposite direction, the warned and not, and right, warned and not, and either we just don't know if that should do the job. That's the point here, this thing, this thing, this thing, this thing, this thing, that someone sees, this thing, is, that it is gone left to pass this death distance, that is it is there to be, to see the use, to see the use of the mind or the way. And this thing, it is very eloquent, saying, I work hard, in the garden of these automators, Now we must believe that the circle was a literal circle, but the literal circle was instigated by the arch enemy of God and his kingdom, namely the devil. And that is demonstrated by such passages as Matthew 13, 38 and 39, Matthew 13, 38 and 39. John 8, 44, Romans 16, 20, 1 John 3, 8, Revelation 12, 9, in a possible form of wisdom, 11, 24, 11, 24. There are a little consideration, that can be clearly in support of that thing, which is divine, direct, from a first speech as to a general, that belongs to the realm of the literal theology and I'm going to mention it to that. But I think that that thing is the one that can clearly be established from the very data provided for such a general. This is later a use in two, the three talks of it. It is perfectly clear that he was the main instrument in the sensation of our faith, working through the medium or the agents of the circle. Now, in this same phase, first phase was subject to unbelieving, customizing the gestures, unbelieving, and customizing. Remember that these, if not originally, hate in the hearts of God, or first parents, in the heart of mind of our first parents, in different origins, they were injected, particularly into the heart and mind of the living, either the self, if it was not sinned to be subtracted to that sinned, our Lord also was subject to it, even more aggravated, consequent. We must remember that it is not sinful to be tempted in the sense in which we are using temptation here. Not sinful to be tempted, it is sinful to tempt, not sinful to be tempted. Now that is why in the ordination of God, the ordination of God and in His providence, hate of innocent, objected to this solicitation to sin. The temptation of evil, or of dividing the pipeline, was not of divine agency, it was in that double sentence, and our first thing was called to obey this silly prohibition, the obedience, the selfishness of the organization of God, that twofolds of evil were focused, you see, in the prohibition, to meet the three of the knowledge of Buddha being, the temptation which directed to the eating of the three of the knowledge of Buddha being, the focus, in the same direction, the focus in such a very free object, consequently, the stringency of the condition is exemplified in the tension between the claims of obedience, arising from the divine position, from the pressures of temptation, arising from the temptous allegation, arising from the temptous allegation, arising from the temptous allegation of the three of the knowledge of Buddha being, the same to the focus in that three pipeline, everything focused on that reason, and where we are solicited to the very thing with it, was prohibited in a different way, and we can see therefore, as illustrates a very important feature of human life, human life, since in the end, and from just in the end, in every different condition, because in the end, in the conditions of original intent, that is never necessary for this little truth, in the deep human life, it is important, for variation and temptation, our art and soul, that is the same detail of it, that is the same detail, which is just precisely his point, since of course, in an entirely different situation, from that of our perspective, he has simply made the grace of God. We must remember in this connection that man has leaner your ability to obey the prohibition of which this person is, leaner your ability, at least he also has the ability to use, leaner your ability to obey, and yet, the possibility of the artist's ability to be artisted, and he has the ability to be artisted, the three of us, now, since he was constantly Q.T. in fact, integrity, he could have disobeyed, he wanted all of them, where, to I too, I come, this person, well, I just don't have it, but you said that the man had a day, and the authority to resist the temptation and darkness as well, is up in your clothes, open your clothes and have on my clothes basis, and because he was created very good, he was created in me with a cup, like this person, holding his ability to obey, and this case is in me with a cup, mainly a very traditional cup, very good, he could not be a very good, he has been a gentleman, with a very remarkable person, he was a step. If inability was an excuse, in his very constitution, then there would have been a defect, in his very constitution, created by God. And that I think will be not only incompatible with the express, but still into the system, respecting his strategy, but it also will be incompatible to perfection, thoughts and evil. So like I said, I thought that when it starts, it was very good. Yes, it was good as a important human being. The analogy is that it is good to invest a little bit. Because it was good to invest a little bit. Yes. The category is good. As we are trying to eat a particular creature, in terms of being in terms of the distinct species, the characteristic characteristic of being. For example, you couldn't speak of the tree as being very good. In precisely the same sense as the animal, it's very good. Because the animal is on a higher, well, a higher, a higher street of being. And consequently you have to apply to the animal certain categories that don't belong to the tree. Of course, you could begin to store the totally lightness entity. You could begin at that lowest level. You could begin with the tree and then work for the animal. And then there are certain animals which are higher intelligence than other animals. And the categories that belong to these more intelligent animals are not precisely the same as those that apply to other categories of animals. You couldn't apply for example to a jellyfish or the categories, for example, that you would have to apply to a dog or horse. And then you come to the highest level of being, human kind. You have to apply new categories there. New categories that don't apply at all in any lower state of being. And I will say that he said very good that he meant that each being was very good in terms of all the categories that are applicable to the species of beings. And to particular factors that they are called upon to share. And so, you could have, you have the power, the power and religion. Not simply intellectual categories, but moral and religious categories. In relation to God, as is, as is clearly mentioned, maybe it also would matter because he is in relation to God. And I would infer that even on the basis of Genesis 1.31, you would have to infer that man was created in respect of his model and religious categories. And therefore only perfect because he was able to obey the wind of God. Yes, the man was the very worthy of following of the people there. Cleaner the ability. Well, just full of ability. Full of ability. Just potentially the word ability by placing the attitude, some sort of attitude, or before it said to him, that he could have for them all the will of God. I mean by cleaner the ability. He could have for them all the will of God and how full they did perfectly. The last point that I was making before I began to ask him was the same question. I would refer you to a most eloquent statement of what I was trying to say very briefly in Calvin's institutes. Calvin's institutes, book 1, chapter 15, section 8. Institutes 1, chapter 15, section 8 because in that particular category, you have to see more eloquent statements in Calvin. Occasionally, Calvin raises to great health and eloquence and to great penetrating thought, well that's one of them. Or that precise question that I feel was just before I tried to answer. Now we come to the fourth position. That is the column. There is comment in this administration. The column comes from close derived from tree of the knowledge that is tree of life. Tree of life. We must not overlook the fact tree of life in this industry. And it is quite clear that to say the very least, the tree of life was the same. In this context, the very word life, the very word life, wound, imply every last. Because it is the most in this context, it is the opposite of death, the opposite of death. In the deepest thereof, there is actually God. Tree of life is contrasted on the only concept of life that is the content in contrast to death. Life that knows no death. But that is confirmed by Genesis 3. It has to go to tree of life and you can live forever. Clearly you are. That's a tree of life.